{"id":"W2024357654","doi":"10.1577/m07-114.1","title":"Graphical Evaluation of Fishery Status Using a Likelihood Inference Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Ontario Commercial Fisheries' Association","funders":"Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University","keywords":"Graphical model; Fishing; Statistical inference; Inference; Fishery; Maximum likelihood; Yield (engineering); Fisheries management; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Machine learning; Biology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01923979,0.001326855,0.001527959,0.01016279,0.0007949164,0.004103537,0.002019446,0.001673582,0.007807898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1279043,0.0006760822,0.002118686,0.003078779,0.002339614,0.004059378,0.00267035,0.001603746,0.0008376593],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001664704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001407882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004410367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002709691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9794922,0.01507164,0.0009321565,0.001290636,0.002922867,0.0002905487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8933705,0.09199233,0.005650743,0.003532652,0.004764905,0.0006887681],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009441997,0.0002570796,0.02595243,0.0007024154,0.001197031,0.0008421127,0.0009155966,0.4493674,0.004877767,0.2035007,0.00441821,0.3070252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010701,0.0001993149,0.003863667,0.0001448375,0.0001598781,0.000245915,0.0001367972,0.8503869,0.001763565,0.1410772,0.001803842,0.0001111453],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008604817,0.00009315181,0.9891734,0.0001856707,0.00001661411,0.00008344351,0.0001739341,0.0006172807,0.001051619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4061099,0.0001628061,0.5913528,0.0001606412,0.00008526498,0.0004163947,0.0005309888,0.0001798897,0.001001262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01923979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02839122953264446,"score_gpt":0.2804457792114354,"score_spread":0.2520545496787909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}