{"id":"W2024553601","doi":"10.1111/j.1536-7150.2005.00395.x","title":"Comments on Four Papers on Economics and Human Heterogeneity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Economics and Sociology","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Epistemology; Mill; Positive economics; History of economic thought; Confusion; Economic Thought; Presentation (obstetrics); Focus (optics); Progressivism; Sociology; Economics; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Law; Psychology; Political science; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000611063,0.0001816054,0.0006712934,0.0001941005,0.0002394107,0.00004055465,0.0001779506,0.00009139703,0.00006136938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002676912,0.0002018773,0.0001425137,0.00001713739,0.0007392357,0.0001755757,0.00004647594,0.0002566125,0.00005068557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001762929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000247686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003053969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004635985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986375,0.00004286674,0.0007772982,0.000290276,0.000005514228,0.0002465542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985304,0.0001521067,0.0009478984,0.0001891287,0.00001299562,0.000167431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006723858,0.00007786529,0.01010849,0.000001946281,0.0001720025,0.000001369019,0.0003970889,0.001699763,0.000006427301,0.9800081,0.00009184903,0.00736782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004616414,0.006401153,0.08262814,0.00003378015,0.00005392321,0.0002667079,0.001333909,0.001252131,0.0001256933,0.25233,0.6497862,0.001171903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829009,0.0002228045,0.00001181067,0.003653805,0.0002754251,0.00006347825,0.00007513724,0.000004729825,0.01279196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901347,0.00468976,0.0002713457,0.004505348,0.0003022226,0.000003004465,0.000003893422,0.00001791803,0.00007177906],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7276781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8232316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03704783389817699,"score_gpt":0.2495198265379821,"score_spread":0.2124719926398052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}