{"id":"W2024582264","doi":"10.1007/s13235-012-0046-7","title":"ε-Subgame Perfectness of an Open-Loop Stackelberg Equilibrium in Linear-State Games","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dynamic Games and Applications","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HEC Montréal","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Subgame; Mathematical economics; Extensive-form game; Backward induction; Computer science; Markov perfect equilibrium; Constraint (computer-aided design); State (computer science); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Repeated game; Equilibrium selection; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002805644,0.001307456,0.00259972,0.001382684,0.001533804,0.004562123,0.00196553,0.00225378,0.007656609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395924,0.001023198,0.001405034,0.0009854087,0.004092975,0.005210411,0.002502167,0.002335283,0.0006217791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002117579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003368669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003664478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002175696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977102,0.0008708371,0.0001373054,0.000408824,0.0003562133,0.0005165886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875536,0.008649538,0.001350136,0.0004108458,0.0009455911,0.00109026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002906524,0.0001134394,0.0007545715,0.0001291971,0.00007720531,0.0001787842,0.0003881624,0.05124296,0.001480729,0.940353,0.001210727,0.003780574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007485531,0.0001060671,0.00031964,0.00002828152,0.00002435607,0.00005210386,0.000138242,0.1334771,0.0003986472,0.864983,0.0003685446,0.00002911517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5219586,0.0003578926,0.415853,0.002090393,0.0001036181,0.0002434819,0.0006066588,0.0003690404,0.0584173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845129,0.0002330342,0.009607697,0.0001870222,0.0000448789,0.0001965304,0.0001533026,0.00003315806,0.00503161],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007656609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0256139,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02162999338847765,"score_gpt":0.2640946454872115,"score_spread":0.2424646520987339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}