{"id":"W2024694080","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2011.01.005","title":"Requirements analysis for customization using subgroup differences and large sample user testing: A case study of information retrieval on handheld devices in healthcare","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Sample (material); Context (archaeology); Mobile device; Computer science; Premise; Sample size determination; Test (biology); User requirements document; Health care; World Wide Web; Software engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001064783,0.00009905464,0.0002619393,0.0006563872,0.00005351343,0.0001175015,0.0004225477,0.00008616408,0.000003338521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008192327,0.00008969254,0.0000609358,0.0003844566,0.00001815828,0.001166438,0.00008512712,0.00016254,1.347396e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001712648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001556662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002263224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103182,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984933,0.0001197654,0.000879007,0.0001273826,0.0002637786,0.0001168102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978215,0.0004270962,0.0009161232,0.0001161506,0.0006628246,0.00005630898],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001823482,0.000556346,0.9829087,0.000008814899,0.0004105672,0.00002393934,0.0061772,0.003010281,0.00002152637,0.0005734849,0.000006491682,0.00447919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0256323,0.009108308,0.3153605,0.0006028984,0.0006789372,0.0004210379,0.01401686,0.628246,0.002885864,0.002043143,0.0001657564,0.0008384067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8781656,0.000005589662,0.1210711,0.00005930433,0.0004464553,0.000217006,0.00002830726,0.000004098027,0.000002511936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896633,0.000002771829,0.01020794,0.00004614221,0.00007196669,0.000001784621,0.00000251418,0.000003046811,5.544653e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6675482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3657556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2492929117235812,"score_gpt":0.3436682670637278,"score_spread":0.09437535534014665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}