{"id":"W2024756800","doi":"10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00401.x","title":"PROPOSITION 8 AND CRIME RATES IN CALIFORNIA: THE CASE OF THE DISAPPEARING DETERRENT","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminology & Public Policy","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ECW Press (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Proposition; Comparability; Deterrence (psychology); Suspect; Scrutiny; Criminology; Sentence; Circumstantial evidence; Reinterpretation; Sanctions; Political science; Law; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005099961,0.0001678394,0.0005026147,0.001574342,0.001938062,0.003205556,0.001277092,0.001226155,0.00617227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01505053,0.000259859,0.0006838871,0.001342259,0.003491996,0.001675789,0.001380413,0.002606414,0.0001756521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005440714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00367595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2135879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1469684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964358,0.001313364,0.0001831268,0.0005808846,0.0007497925,0.0007371163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793811,0.01143541,0.004178389,0.0008616547,0.002957391,0.001185936],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006052377,0.0007613927,0.8032185,0.000393196,0.0004833491,0.001139803,0.005355238,0.007037076,0.0001862679,0.1489397,0.01281051,0.01906972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001890563,0.0008193486,0.9334568,0.0002712226,0.0005187074,0.000338615,0.01446881,0.01049658,0.0005619166,0.02302707,0.01575862,0.00009323978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445752,0.00102485,0.0005074502,0.006659525,0.0000571768,0.00005520503,0.0004338966,0.00001431272,0.0466724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997467,0.000284891,0.0001963171,0.0003626021,0.0000365768,0.00003088888,0.0001770125,0.000002384804,0.001442268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2135879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4246892,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08707210039925148,"score_gpt":0.3725143059846713,"score_spread":0.2854422055854198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}