{"id":"W2024759304","doi":"10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000158","title":"Evaluation of Electric Arc Furnace Slag as a Potential Phosphate-Removal Substrate","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering","topic":"Phosphorus and nutrient management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phosphorus; Aeration; Electric arc furnace; Slag (welding); Chemistry; Substrate (aquarium); Phosphate; Wastewater; Environmental engineering; Adsorption; Waste management; Pulp and paper industry; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Metallurgy; Materials science; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001105624,0.0001722335,0.0002176888,0.00009662566,0.00004093831,0.00001767843,0.0002420907,0.00005052881,0.001057384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002896377,0.0001608473,0.0001512507,0.0001882983,0.00002817707,0.0003384499,0.00005353712,0.0001867295,0.00005526391],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005076246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001319057,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009710424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.278761e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99766,0.00003601094,0.000485977,0.0001584506,0.001390407,0.0002691736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993702,0.00001173897,0.0003304382,0.00014926,0.000008959786,0.0001294134],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008660296,0.000342151,0.0006379272,0.000004647418,0.00006484988,0.00008507879,0.0001093006,0.2812918,0.6731135,0.00004715078,0.0001436904,0.04407324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004329152,0.001990875,0.4707293,0.0001001243,0.0007481535,0.0007814451,0.0001839409,0.1600498,0.3547574,0.001561456,0.004083512,0.0006848652],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961308,0.001254139,0.0009330122,0.00007670817,0.0001946077,0.0001672998,0.000001638822,0.000008228209,0.001233602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985829,0.0003885246,0.0008519063,0.00004013599,0.00005986696,0.00000146795,0.000001221368,0.00001354659,0.00006042261],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4700914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005432938498678652,"score_gpt":0.1953154534479661,"score_spread":0.1898825149492874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}