{"id":"W2024791377","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.025","title":"Cluster analysis of roadside ultrafine particle size distributions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Cluster (spacecraft); Ultrafine particle; Particle-size distribution; Particle size; Environmental science; Cluster size; Particle (ecology); Physics; Materials science; Computer science; Nanotechnology; Geology; Chemical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004890433,0.0001349497,0.0002550292,0.000001702616,0.0001154017,0.000005670873,0.000131344,0.00006186066,0.01746304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007433908,0.0001202453,0.0001274962,0.0004365502,0.0002159051,0.0002121291,0.0001221022,0.00008456765,0.000751108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002702294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004731087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004489202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004239157,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984612,0.0001096621,0.0003758456,0.0001972696,0.0003423298,0.0005136986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989387,0.0001831373,0.0001469902,0.0003916494,0.000001556626,0.0003379686],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001916511,0.0005291983,0.9564856,0.000005205506,0.0001590991,5.164916e-7,0.0008560477,0.03485448,0.0008184168,0.0002210149,0.00286459,0.003186692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002081147,0.0000591024,0.9549155,0.000002133901,0.0003496604,9.229661e-7,0.00009009662,0.007133417,0.000779762,0.00004018181,0.03628068,0.000140425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.985104,0.0001413567,0.01086735,0.002283807,0.00004825705,0.0001776714,0.00001728585,0.0000226906,0.001337597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876001,0.00008533941,0.01013311,0.001364481,0.00002783127,0.00002255966,0.00001566475,0.000009549561,0.0007413757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03341609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9834352,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01690284192158326,"score_gpt":0.2610900731681693,"score_spread":0.2441872312465861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}