{"id":"W2024898295","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.002","title":"A two parameter driving force for fatigue crack growth analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fatigue","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":326,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Crack closure; Materials science; Crack growth resistance curve; Paris' law; Structural engineering; Crack tip opening displacement; Plane stress; Plasticity; Composite material; Stress concentration; Stress (linguistics); Residual stress; Fracture mechanics; Finite element method; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000295254,0.0001792208,0.0003110614,0.000525674,0.00003560138,0.0001021605,0.0004963996,0.0000739688,0.0001100984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002606732,0.0001607883,0.0004416623,0.0002336074,0.0000169594,0.0004938554,0.00002453227,0.0002356464,0.000006399669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001476625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002632294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007487653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004745024,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985613,0.000020552,0.000628241,0.0001226812,0.0004543983,0.0002127908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986326,0.0003051666,0.0002430563,0.0001282924,0.0005826266,0.0001082572],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001417506,0.0002050086,0.01148493,0.0000565061,0.009712537,0.00006891794,0.001628119,0.8677536,0.01062455,0.01015224,0.01091458,0.07725722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003550287,0.0002314658,0.003436104,0.0002543377,0.001206342,0.0001400824,0.0002553313,0.9148837,0.05126287,0.009439426,0.01453319,0.0008068275],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1058314,0.0002495749,0.8908872,0.0009312309,0.001110963,0.0001051906,0.00002195729,0.0000459158,0.0008166142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567274,0.00007447068,0.04191828,0.0002416127,0.0009003844,0.00000838609,0.00001941758,0.0000294318,0.00008062731],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8508961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6556756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02312916764402227,"score_gpt":0.2964980016362163,"score_spread":0.273368833992194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}