{"id":"W2024898295","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.002","title":"A two parameter driving force for fatigue crack growth analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Fatigue","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":326,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Crack closure; Materials science; Crack growth resistance curve; Paris' law; Structural engineering; Crack tip opening displacement; Plane stress; Plasticity; Composite material; Stress concentration; Stress (linguistics); Residual stress; Fracture mechanics; Finite element method; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003388769,0.00045765,0.0004323371,0.0005712566,0.0004587172,0.0004466884,0.0008208124,0.001078673,0.002509221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009959129,0.0002740808,0.0005290396,0.0003257351,0.0003125151,0.0006631978,0.0006263374,0.000502335,0.0005153905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004769149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006843735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004115064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003278408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998561,0.0000256369,0.000005729685,0.00001791426,0.00007492639,0.00001956759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997285,0.0001083554,0.00001916012,0.00004307551,0.00008444182,0.00001638158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002725239,0.000312105,0.002580084,0.0003118575,0.00007182064,0.0005235601,0.0002378465,0.6065726,0.2230937,0.0517985,0.001923536,0.1123018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007614836,0.00003487984,0.0003670052,0.000003569002,0.000006044651,0.00004115171,0.000007477421,0.9923379,0.005085144,0.0008221239,0.001275776,0.00001145741],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1943572,0.0004546447,0.790779,0.0001967028,0.0001189569,0.0002557105,0.0003037429,0.0006239712,0.01291011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256956,0.0003061668,0.0651542,0.00004847742,0.00004658677,0.0002228101,0.0001599867,0.0001881435,0.008178012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004115064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008394122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02312916764402227,"score_gpt":0.2964980016362163,"score_spread":0.273368833992194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}