{"id":"W2024965224","doi":"10.4236/jsea.2013.610a005","title":"Traceability in Acceptance Testing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Software Engineering and Applications","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Traceability; Computer science; Software engineering; Acceptance testing; Requirements traceability; Executable; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Stakeholder; Model-based testing; Systems engineering; Test strategy; Risk analysis (engineering); Software; Reliability engineering; Test case; Software development; Engineering; Requirement; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03204132,0.001734817,0.001585259,0.004651919,0.001534157,0.005065551,0.00425943,0.005284752,0.005178234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1912414,0.001150219,0.001991504,0.002977592,0.01014501,0.01460161,0.003935448,0.005462732,0.0006715076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002748452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00290202,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004108132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001395423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9547568,0.02623515,0.002935203,0.003859118,0.01096526,0.001248434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7568335,0.2007255,0.009058879,0.02218898,0.01004035,0.001152633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000172515,0.0002563039,0.006231293,0.0007336629,0.000123866,0.0009511604,0.002520045,0.03777657,0.001742722,0.8055961,0.001008798,0.142887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008768563,0.0003159277,0.001219573,0.0005440746,0.00008192646,0.0008952091,0.0004053731,0.08800304,0.003040291,0.8959622,0.009370129,0.00007441874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01980958,0.001948072,0.9609233,0.002166597,0.0001375755,0.0002718984,0.00006498161,0.000562586,0.01411554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7107495,0.003133069,0.2762718,0.001303895,0.0004724105,0.001222326,0.0003389117,0.0004246198,0.006083378],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03204132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1694527,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01271327666523976,"score_gpt":0.2267064411533581,"score_spread":0.2139931644881184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}