{"id":"W2025028878","doi":"10.1016/s0828-282x(08)70198-3","title":"Myocardial bridge: Is the risk of perforation increased?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Coronary Artery Anomalies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Intravascular ultrasound; Myocardial bridge; Stent; Perforation; Restenosis; Bridge (graph theory); Cardiology; Radiology; Drug-eluting stent; Coronary stent; Balloon; Surgery; Internal medicine; Coronary angiography; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001438703,0.000435948,0.001257612,0.001621483,0.0005005453,0.002163528,0.0006618724,0.005230286,0.008346561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130348,0.000442029,0.0009912116,0.002025353,0.001012747,0.002535693,0.0004166231,0.003090009,0.00129873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004828741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005307665,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009520857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001192005,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986336,0.0002927836,0.000170882,0.0001931032,0.0003939715,0.0003157457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939956,0.002062973,0.002314306,0.0003704157,0.0005815004,0.0006753402],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001397055,0.0001472589,0.9525592,0.0001813446,0.0003041942,0.007352583,0.0001111231,0.0001314841,0.0009726486,0.00064345,0.00208413,0.03411543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001276427,0.0005754764,0.9536897,0.0003210768,0.0006052456,0.03608849,0.001001469,0.0008760979,0.0005431771,0.003030383,0.003087642,0.00005356411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9294347,0.02326714,0.001051302,0.01820075,0.0007621609,0.00004952135,0.0004120108,0.00006309786,0.02675932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885972,0.005922897,0.0004366873,0.001460964,0.002504743,0.00001117542,0.0002476725,0.00001339953,0.000805237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008346561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02792203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01802422174538294,"score_gpt":0.2248960150638526,"score_spread":0.2068717933184697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}