{"id":"W2025210875","doi":"10.1016/s1387-3806(99)00175-x","title":"The proton affinities of amin-alkanes. A test case for the kinetic method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mass Spectrometry","topic":"Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chemistry; Affinities; Benzylamine; Kinetic energy; Proton; Logarithm; Metastability; Alkyl; Ion; Computational chemistry; Mass spectrometry; Stereochemistry; Medicinal chemistry; Organic chemistry; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000660051,0.0001593178,0.0002300815,0.0001604447,0.0001644121,0.0001189888,0.001040405,0.00007252587,0.004844983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003824833,0.00009504941,0.0003028034,0.0002506447,0.000133224,0.00008666433,0.00004141333,0.0003466283,0.00000377678],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001327728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007157782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004163559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007474229,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983594,0.00002424409,0.0007007836,0.0001435335,0.0005565044,0.0002155167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959942,0.002580981,0.000592455,0.000318654,0.000457045,0.0000566528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001727869,0.001991624,0.005028418,0.0004091281,0.003257693,0.001169203,0.0007864737,0.000479575,0.5006382,0.1481634,0.01160217,0.3247462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001957507,0.0006118273,0.0006100285,0.0001799733,0.0003013345,0.013533,0.001495526,0.002950229,0.6320962,0.05577998,0.2900769,0.0004074724],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4816429,0.008736307,0.1795885,0.05537906,0.001542765,0.003487615,0.001366147,0.0003504735,0.2679062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965278,0.000856347,0.03067964,0.00006382939,0.0007088282,0.0001227673,0.000004100194,0.00002635537,0.002260169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.483635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01438166494135449,"score_gpt":0.3093638151759831,"score_spread":0.2949821502346286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}