{"id":"W2025234276","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2009.02.003","title":"Development of a pit filling algorithm for LiDAR canopy height models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Geosciences","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Computer science; Algorithm; Limit (mathematics); Tree (set theory); Graphical user interface; Pixel; Crown (dentistry); Canopy; Visualization; Remote sensing; Computer graphics (images); Computer vision; Data mining; Geology; Mathematics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002249996,0.00009699024,0.0001236667,0.00003869272,0.0002950354,0.00003621419,0.0003390779,0.00002944914,0.00001221391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003936173,0.00008259931,0.00004455705,0.0002762522,0.000155329,0.0001398259,0.00005458764,0.00003761127,0.00001337279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005096056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004211663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007026179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001846402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989702,0.00000990322,0.0002185554,0.0003071849,0.0002521948,0.0002419259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996142,0.00003801176,0.00008704648,0.0001644557,0.00001410221,0.0000821684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000134103,0.00005066243,0.00003359068,0.000001788183,0.000002658324,3.38463e-7,0.001873336,0.005684892,0.003965782,0.0001790623,0.0005358385,0.9876707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001530207,0.00007740931,0.003077219,0.00002473806,0.000005739039,0.000004355863,0.0001381049,0.956172,0.008644578,0.004210366,0.02729184,0.0002006018],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1475469,0.00002783715,0.8501456,0.0002230769,0.000129347,0.0001801099,0.000003350787,0.00003312694,0.001710621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3101827,0.000003776061,0.6894912,0.0001592547,0.00002423803,0.000002033841,0.000003501413,0.000002828284,0.0001305238],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3368302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01920025745063972,"score_gpt":0.2382572589365679,"score_spread":0.2190570014859281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}