{"id":"W2025290054","doi":"10.1007/s10009-014-0305-6","title":"Quantitative and qualitative analysis of SysML activity diagrams","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Systems Modeling Language; Correctness; Soundness; Model checking; Probabilistic logic; Theoretical computer science; Activity diagram; Programming language; Probabilistic CTL; Modeling language; Software engineering; Unified Modeling Language; Software; Artificial intelligence; Probabilistic analysis of algorithms","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004466987,0.0002649487,0.0001785083,0.00425449,0.0004803043,0.001594164,0.0004263544,0.0003151003,0.005782272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02416565,0.0001605735,0.0003307027,0.001644866,0.0009006706,0.001009378,0.0005307609,0.0005832996,0.0004907561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001264681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00136033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003106176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003167534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948389,0.002130016,0.000260181,0.0002788033,0.002285972,0.0002060982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9390124,0.04589001,0.001825415,0.001540581,0.01124317,0.0004884857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001859404,0.0007443286,0.05296796,0.003453317,0.0001211148,0.0008787132,0.03627567,0.03672201,0.2522443,0.1212399,0.006639872,0.4868535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001811047,0.001054659,0.1071104,0.0009600752,0.0001952901,0.001302076,0.02399987,0.4398548,0.3098808,0.05816945,0.05701806,0.0002734466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.453446,0.0002708258,0.523208,0.0006610824,0.00007415859,0.0005805393,0.002454891,0.001768646,0.01753584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256099,0.00009406038,0.0699905,0.00003872387,0.00001424081,0.0003014882,0.0007567449,0.0001209191,0.003073422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005782272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02362394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06253671070161998,"score_gpt":0.3890180161623299,"score_spread":0.3264813054607099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}