{"id":"W2025301472","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.04.004","title":"The use of passive treatment alternatives for the mitigation of acidic drainage at the Williams Brother mine, California: Bench-scale study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Geochemistry","topic":"Mine drainage and remediation techniques","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Acid mine drainage; Effluent; Environmental science; Peat; Biofilter; Water quality; Anoxic waters; Drainage; San Joaquin; Schwertmannite; Environmental chemistry; Environmental engineering; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Geology; Adsorption; Ecology; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001755055,0.0001226654,0.0001122159,0.000005553029,0.0002435645,0.00001560493,0.0002694799,0.00005477484,0.0002645819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005258698,0.00005527911,0.00007400044,0.00007640237,0.0006434411,0.00003000448,0.00008535854,0.00007998436,0.000006544562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004037678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000871581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002079546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006137881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992157,0.00001673934,0.0002152618,0.0001836449,0.0002292574,0.000139453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987182,0.0005539333,0.0002286904,0.0004523486,0.00001952927,0.0000273151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004088704,0.0002005022,0.003753127,0.000009713162,0.00005773038,3.697197e-7,0.00197053,0.00006735876,0.9809327,0.00005615516,0.002152827,0.01075811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096458,0.00005689073,0.001847472,0.000002449867,0.00004573045,9.276109e-7,0.001635329,0.0001598251,0.9863904,0.0006938211,0.008787674,0.00006987863],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958101,0.00002151352,0.000353581,0.0006146593,0.00003430915,0.001056876,0.00008246097,0.00001328086,0.002013252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975491,0.00002185514,0.0001879144,0.00004023774,0.00004825528,0.0005444528,0.00002295936,0.000009936657,0.001575321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01068824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2896986,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0096911201496138,"score_gpt":0.2341817905747705,"score_spread":0.2244906704251567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}