{"id":"W2025308546","doi":"10.1139/x00-154","title":"A cautionary note on the minimum crown cover criterion in forest definitions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Sampling (signal processing); Forest cover; Crown (dentistry); Mathematics; Statistics; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001309669,0.000097674,0.000104049,0.0005067257,0.0004014909,0.0001157476,0.0005307302,0.00006306713,0.00726833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003944213,0.00007113018,0.00007290603,0.0008188417,0.0005443555,0.0002440497,0.0000592949,0.0005668934,0.002108946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006000409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003162765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03272153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4292364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982797,0.0001821137,0.0002594925,0.0001328204,0.0005276617,0.0006182333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989634,0.0002867733,0.00005852371,0.000235667,0.0000429151,0.000412792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008675151,0.00005264976,0.7046424,0.000005328079,0.000008471155,0.0009546253,0.0006426072,0.004369202,0.0000321039,0.01561651,0.2726754,0.0009139155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002901592,0.0002295397,0.7240366,0.00005862338,0.000003653182,0.00008381759,0.00005999671,0.0006025583,0.000004458029,0.009185269,0.2653567,0.00008862334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843197,0.00004819133,0.00001022656,0.01077868,0.0001045239,0.000177173,0.000009847462,0.000002172712,0.1045495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947835,0.0000813872,0.00003686577,0.0006283344,0.0001361397,0.00001099826,0.000004639621,0.00001222136,0.004305925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3965148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07937948499471684,"score_gpt":0.3200509219949456,"score_spread":0.2406714370002287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}