{"id":"W2025329530","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01321.x","title":"<scp>Number of Accidents or Number of Claims? An Approach with Zero‐Inflated Poisson Models for Panel Data</scp>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Poisson distribution; Count data; Zero-inflated model; Panel data; Distribution (mathematics); Compound Poisson distribution; Actuarial science; Accident (philosophy); Econometrics; Meaning (existential); Zero (linguistics); Poisson regression; Compound Poisson process; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Poisson process; Sociology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005555352,0.0002914513,0.001104606,0.000185374,0.0001521115,0.0001219118,0.002475315,0.0002354214,0.00002215907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002161235,0.0001664829,0.0002523953,0.0009067059,0.0002097283,0.003228805,0.0001149107,0.0005042905,0.000008961319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005015216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003104614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001019206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004145674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944312,0.0003886979,0.002098333,0.0005778475,0.002093227,0.0004107098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917461,0.001389266,0.003146392,0.001450036,0.002007752,0.0002604326],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006350934,0.003986069,0.6616982,0.0001320298,0.0004636841,0.0000461452,0.008439702,0.2060631,0.001073256,0.003019782,0.006351392,0.1023757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006923075,0.001237941,0.4681423,0.0004091459,0.0002499312,0.0007474985,0.001303244,0.1203665,0.001997681,0.3968892,0.001383021,0.0003503829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947021,0.0002059436,0.1036402,0.00006050858,0.0001455284,0.0003175522,0.0003566706,0.00001265933,0.0005588807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466345,0.0004013451,0.0525515,0.00006247822,0.00009523865,0.000002774659,0.00001047114,0.0000206631,0.0002209813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3938694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6788976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1660362348971434,"score_gpt":0.3966661268483997,"score_spread":0.2306298919512563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}