{"id":"W2025330874","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0088773","title":"Game-Theoretic Methods for Functional Response and Optimal Foraging Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Foraging; Optimal foraging theory; Nash equilibrium; Predation; Best response; Game theory; Functional response; Predator; Computer science; Ecology; Mathematical economics; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003081929,0.001879616,0.001302115,0.002109022,0.0007523581,0.001410009,0.001953121,0.001408589,0.007149515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008416443,0.0006283233,0.002195882,0.001554312,0.002061442,0.001887259,0.001709398,0.002914103,0.001256657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002137777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001383177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004073297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00232998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985256,0.0009190275,0.0000690497,0.000142037,0.0002443336,0.0001000298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961008,0.003002164,0.0003027034,0.0002207751,0.0002790172,0.00009449761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007234099,0.00003637389,0.0002247953,0.0001035243,0.00004666476,0.00005303324,0.0001065169,0.2246446,0.0004672895,0.7633148,0.001101363,0.009893846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007125799,0.00001299421,0.00005772819,0.00002187225,0.000008472948,0.00002293896,0.00002130526,0.6090537,0.00008635025,0.3885351,0.002161663,0.00001075428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001197951,0.0002351955,0.9944635,0.0001274903,0.00003030328,0.00004011004,0.0000441117,0.00003283798,0.003828435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2368253,0.001989906,0.7478046,0.0003447618,0.0002564384,0.001525592,0.0003073725,0.0002597211,0.01068636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007149515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0239175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06687892593153448,"score_gpt":0.3448902941686313,"score_spread":0.2780113682370968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}