{"id":"W2025330874","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0088773","title":"Game-Theoretic Methods for Functional Response and Optimal Foraging Behavior","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hungarian Scientific Research Fund","keywords":"Foraging; Optimal foraging theory; Nash equilibrium; Predation; Best response; Game theory; Functional response; Predator; Computer science; Ecology; Mathematical economics; Biology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002980795,0.00005599593,0.00009314885,0.00004183945,0.0004197848,0.00004119119,0.00005928792,0.00005270628,0.000141298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009109218,0.00005787674,0.00002504754,0.00007547948,0.0002145177,0.0001579876,0.00001695446,0.00005736153,0.000009508924],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003563797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005468437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007532714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007504246,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986762,0.0007873044,0.00009814027,0.0001467191,0.000138278,0.0001533675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988399,0.0008778719,0.00003212786,0.00007854206,0.0001069124,0.00006465206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001567951,0.0006085145,0.002284889,0.0000357426,0.00004866258,4.034314e-7,0.0054366,0.00004434794,0.04938646,0.9197004,0.00005452114,0.02083154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007845443,0.004416525,0.1284597,0.0006508007,0.002615236,0.00001855366,0.01320164,0.1024139,0.0769949,0.6044999,0.05613311,0.002750385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8714518,0.00007692716,0.1258782,0.0009125996,0.00005209349,0.0002891989,0.000003472236,0.00005825086,0.00127749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412551,0.00001350923,0.05603855,0.0001338451,0.0002151946,0.0001598665,0.000008000973,0.000008270351,0.0021677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3152005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3228687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06687892593153448,"score_gpt":0.3448902941686313,"score_spread":0.2780113682370968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}