{"id":"W2025337539","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2008.10.002","title":"Consumer valuation of functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada. A conjoint study using probiotics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appetite","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Conjoint analysis; Marketing; Nutraceutical; Functional food; Valuation (finance); Product (mathematics); Health claims on food labels; Cluster (spacecraft); Willingness to pay; Health benefits; Value (mathematics); Business; Economics; Food science; Medicine; Microeconomics; Statistics; Traditional medicine; Mathematics; Computer science; Preference","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00177439,0.0002481882,0.0002959986,0.0006339463,0.003308481,0.001196752,0.0005081606,0.0004836227,0.002555612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005549438,0.0003029722,0.0004876774,0.00183384,0.001199889,0.000489369,0.000698959,0.0008901835,0.0001688489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02254988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01428062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989302,0.0002214812,0.00003421263,0.00009220619,0.0005773752,0.0001445925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973963,0.0006474506,0.0002772641,0.00007942651,0.001169546,0.0004300235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005238145,0.002326618,0.8808067,0.0001969046,0.0001797512,0.0004367559,0.02600353,0.000598993,0.004492679,0.001160694,0.002737142,0.07582206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787865,0.0007664293,0.981638,0.0000395078,0.0000619683,0.00007880222,0.01228134,0.001391907,0.0006911386,0.0001623021,0.002750771,0.0000600457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981287,0.0001758879,0.00009419723,0.000125254,0.000006374824,0.00004400719,0.0001692797,0.000001986885,0.001254385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972793,0.0002243082,0.000350973,0.00009498704,0.000002741376,0.00002010827,0.000137706,0.00000201621,0.001887779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02254988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1636116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1038577254069942,"score_gpt":0.3004626094046611,"score_spread":0.196604883997667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}