{"id":"W2025337539","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2008.10.002","title":"Consumer valuation of functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada. A conjoint study using probiotics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appetite","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Conjoint analysis; Marketing; Nutraceutical; Functional food; Valuation (finance); Product (mathematics); Health claims on food labels; Cluster (spacecraft); Willingness to pay; Health benefits; Value (mathematics); Business; Economics; Food science; Medicine; Microeconomics; Statistics; Traditional medicine; Mathematics; Computer science; Preference","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001603634,0.00007117006,0.000196965,0.00004571242,0.00003543522,0.000002639517,0.00001593189,0.00002514431,0.00003656782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000485053,0.00006552871,0.0000149717,0.0001191494,0.00005405833,0.00002272898,0.00002264089,0.0000959406,9.283462e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009911578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006553735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09549762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2461081,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992797,0.00002711287,0.0002460492,0.0001346733,0.0001978198,0.0001146327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996523,0.00005567835,0.00004762488,0.00009997525,0.0000880544,0.00005633472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001134523,0.0002531351,0.9914603,0.0001184412,0.0001422011,0.00003776195,0.000393295,0.00008037072,0.006203691,0.0001369584,0.00001295366,0.001047411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002624207,0.0002444012,0.9866687,0.0003606616,0.0002091638,0.00016653,0.000551597,0.008034272,0.0007424972,0.00002524803,0.0002569214,0.0001157971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997735,0.001383071,0.0001771047,0.0001415274,0.0000522404,0.0004155937,0.000003732423,0.000005210369,0.00008647029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990026,0.00005333831,0.0008104792,0.00008373683,0.00001489917,0.000003934535,0.00000350952,0.000007129954,0.00002031487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1506105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9105256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1038577254069942,"score_gpt":0.3004626094046611,"score_spread":0.196604883997667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}