{"id":"W2025479455","doi":"10.5402/2012/203796","title":"Scoping a Public Health Impact Assessment of Aquaculture with Particular Reference to Tilapia in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISRN Public Health","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Research Councils UK","keywords":"Aquaculture; Public health; Health impact assessment; Business; Environmental planning; Impact assessment; Agriculture; Environmental impact assessment; Tilapia; Focus group; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Marketing; Medicine; Economics; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744418,0.0002286424,0.0004165512,0.00007196883,0.0002651924,0.00008199958,0.0004055726,0.00005078059,0.0004418605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008499669,0.0001197298,0.00006270544,0.001001346,0.0001153475,0.0003996329,0.0002242774,0.0003191738,0.00004481484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005896023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004795194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005197625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01259211,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968095,0.0003756539,0.0004791332,0.0003279746,0.0007313826,0.001276297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986058,0.00005177071,0.0002538875,0.0004418911,0.00002901643,0.0006176424],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004482518,0.0003524821,0.9701228,0.0001062398,0.00002600572,0.000001017843,0.01278703,0.00002564386,0.00002961556,0.003137723,0.006686918,0.00672011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002548184,0.0004663202,0.951052,0.0001084126,0.000002482492,0.000009843057,0.00223019,0.00001968993,0.000003200908,0.00001709357,0.04568169,0.0001542972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8560067,0.0004873844,0.001117246,0.1185592,0.00007029471,0.002034291,0.00002113913,0.00005586547,0.02164788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910387,0.0001019562,0.001497907,0.00710009,0.00004822684,0.0001031336,0.00002262893,0.00001180169,0.00007560139],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.135032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7857289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08147155454617742,"score_gpt":0.3810856936647916,"score_spread":0.2996141391186142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}