{"id":"W2025515470","doi":"10.1139/x00-168","title":"Analysing the Finnish pulpwood market under alternative hypotheses of competition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pulpwood; Monopsony; Economics; Cournot competition; Microeconomics; Perfect competition; Competition (biology); Recession; Boom; Imperfect competition; Macroeconomics; Pulp and paper industry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588746,0.00007429614,0.0001246179,0.0003394817,0.0002662397,0.00008702778,0.0005992996,0.00003195147,0.009046478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002042587,0.00005187405,0.00008340789,0.0007332534,0.0007040804,0.0002228375,0.00005653617,0.0003000396,0.0001096134],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002654853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001624865,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0463411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2539197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984523,0.0002290244,0.00024887,0.00009629101,0.0005701028,0.0004033901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990906,0.0002193454,0.0001304798,0.0001962437,0.00008304898,0.0002803162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000566094,0.00003812465,0.8998041,0.00001049992,0.00009612905,0.0001935882,0.0007341086,0.009606366,0.00009466511,0.008322711,0.07625966,0.004783517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000305067,0.0002146113,0.887558,0.00006918378,0.00002149634,0.00006715207,0.0003971061,0.001253776,0.00009032695,0.01566212,0.09425948,0.0001016601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8733752,0.00008582199,0.0000592819,0.002364585,0.00006333026,0.0000992698,0.000004961109,0.000001234829,0.1239463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945298,0.00008129492,0.00005005593,0.0001085685,0.0001291623,0.000001539324,0.00000127005,0.000008758247,0.00508952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2075786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06430805211547927,"score_gpt":0.3171104353759164,"score_spread":0.2528023832604371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}