{"id":"W2025515470","doi":"10.1139/x00-168","title":"Analysing the Finnish pulpwood market under alternative hypotheses of competition","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pulpwood; Monopsony; Economics; Cournot competition; Microeconomics; Perfect competition; Competition (biology); Recession; Boom; Imperfect competition; Macroeconomics; Pulp and paper industry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001793889,0.0003968884,0.0007470783,0.0006177927,0.0006467307,0.001969423,0.001167441,0.001750389,0.006048064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006621952,0.0003775499,0.0008951025,0.0007248482,0.001115566,0.001699447,0.0005609374,0.0008187614,0.0002302853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002895871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00124984,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02787241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01785492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993449,0.0002315008,0.0000217746,0.00007893549,0.00007947345,0.0002433983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946249,0.004091678,0.0006200052,0.0001638924,0.0002696203,0.0002298482],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009351328,0.0002651853,0.02457486,0.0001241652,0.0001605566,0.0006521839,0.0003582031,0.936984,0.00183971,0.02992177,0.0007829924,0.003401175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002805544,0.000344769,0.01441191,0.00001401475,0.00009368,0.00009484982,0.0006474889,0.9714416,0.0008277996,0.01123812,0.0005445025,0.00006072578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958559,0.00006878265,0.0009546279,0.0001089109,0.000004527035,0.00001250644,0.0001329386,0.000008720307,0.00285313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983972,0.00006364908,0.0004005156,0.00001949394,0.000004642749,0.00001244379,0.0001970443,0.000003193283,0.000901771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02787241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05542034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06430805211547927,"score_gpt":0.3171104353759164,"score_spread":0.2528023832604371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}