{"id":"W2025521115","doi":"10.1139/x03-075","title":"Do critical load models adequately protect forests? A case study in south-central Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Leaching (pedology); Soil water; Deposition (geology); Environmental science; Saturation (graph theory); Critical load; Soil science; Acid deposition; Molar ratio; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Geology; Mathematics; Materials science; Geotechnical engineering; Geomorphology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006515699,0.0003589186,0.000283704,0.0003967654,0.0009771601,0.0008043545,0.0008118184,0.0004783201,0.0007781238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00205618,0.0002090455,0.0002512017,0.0005993308,0.0005427159,0.0005930696,0.0003327667,0.0002332012,0.0000600022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008021113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005373565,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8750523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997824,0.00004137977,0.00001022652,0.00003649558,0.00004139228,0.00008818344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992896,0.0003205631,0.00007858098,0.00004813344,0.0001867324,0.00007627444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000253492,0.00007462494,0.2488701,0.0001216558,0.00007229429,0.000690809,0.0005202524,0.7240263,0.003013818,0.003379778,0.00124535,0.01773156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007131674,0.00007482489,0.1083082,0.00003324545,0.0000630726,0.0001398665,0.00131044,0.881562,0.001976574,0.003556578,0.002868008,0.00003594502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945282,0.00008232929,0.002926616,0.000113324,0.000002398293,0.00002827838,0.0002475726,0.00004867588,0.002022618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978694,0.00003980508,0.001542231,0.00001134589,0.000001407212,0.000007294578,0.0001211613,0.000009088522,0.0003982211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.251367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1200014814095975,"score_gpt":0.3226582424826969,"score_spread":0.2026567610730995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}