{"id":"W2025543749","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.002","title":"Use of a New Public Bicycle Share Program in Montreal, Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":189,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Random digit dialing; Cycling; Public health; Logistic regression; Public transport; Environmental health; Population; Gerontology; Telephone survey; Stratified sampling; Injury prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Demography; Geography; Business; Transport engineering; Advertising; Engineering; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005773004,0.00008642488,0.0004017577,0.0001336236,0.0000414368,0.000007250461,0.0003005645,0.00001917384,0.0008473388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003997194,0.00006343651,0.00006521082,0.0007039979,0.0006452615,0.0003587569,0.00001246773,0.0001662299,3.386939e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001141844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001225674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9553921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9651517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984698,0.000187846,0.000529574,0.0001104473,0.0004676571,0.0002346858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985875,0.00009177089,0.0006848325,0.0001092565,0.0002500087,0.0002766528],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005835043,0.0001684408,0.7856232,0.000006086374,0.00003976117,0.00004333443,0.01053409,2.410846e-7,0.00001330516,0.00002894088,0.00213708,0.2013472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003847129,0.0005363334,0.983573,0.0001628401,0.00003728042,9.566043e-7,0.009325681,0.000001746394,0.00003049299,0.000517158,0.005365447,0.00006440259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959459,0.0002632976,0.00009022839,0.001426388,0.0001323241,0.0001799341,0.000005131998,0.000005362687,0.00195145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985507,0.00005311705,0.00069807,0.00008568095,0.0001428913,0.000002047984,0.000001699486,0.000005339195,0.0004605192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2012828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9277765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07328162101021343,"score_gpt":0.3247282607564227,"score_spread":0.2514466397462093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}