{"id":"W2025545481","doi":"10.1139/z00-117","title":"Seasonal home range size and philopatry in two northern white-tailed deer populations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Odocoileus; Philopatry; Biology; Home range; Population density; Intraspecific competition; Population; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Forage; Competition (biology); Population size; Zoology; Habitat; Biological dispersal; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001868732,0.00006342742,0.0001224188,0.00005815486,0.00008950802,0.000008619141,0.00009847128,0.00006206294,0.009606317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005509955,0.00006274345,0.00002528549,0.0001223255,0.0001568053,0.000145927,0.00000616976,0.0001684337,0.0001051791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001440913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001303025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002354677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7426016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993778,0.00008255577,0.0001943439,0.00009065789,0.00005331245,0.0002012692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995914,0.00004762508,0.00006424023,0.00006013685,0.00001064952,0.0002259338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000187241,0.000007342333,0.9954647,5.79675e-7,0.000004227855,0.0001013954,0.0001989299,0.000616778,0.000004713531,0.00002058745,0.0002702872,0.003291704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005451085,0.00004136075,0.9964259,0.000004696372,0.000009462091,0.0002279894,0.00002796437,0.00006580626,1.928288e-7,0.001909222,0.000677174,0.00006515436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939228,0.0001002016,0.000006185087,0.004325716,0.0001447934,0.00004497538,0.000004428724,0.000001871835,0.00144906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979153,0.000006003436,0.000230551,0.001314396,0.00006009128,0.000001686336,0.000001592875,0.000005127331,0.0004652739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7402469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009400582343491087,"score_gpt":0.2099791060537285,"score_spread":0.2005785237102374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}