{"id":"W2025557034","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.005","title":"Repetitive antisaccade execution does not increase the unidirectional prosaccade switch-cost","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Antisaccade task; Saccade; Stimulus (psychology); Schedule; Task switching; Corollary; Visual field; Computer science; Eye movement; Psychology; Neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Cognition; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006320423,0.0001916692,0.0001486119,0.00006841822,0.0006453462,0.0001478519,0.0004339047,0.0001528514,0.0008194837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001146274,0.0001048077,0.00007557746,0.0003257064,0.0002265824,0.0002340862,0.00006764992,0.0003883233,0.0003450746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002878314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002047889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001881211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005034622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997995,0.0004616377,0.0002375271,0.0006396298,0.0003463221,0.0003198583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989901,0.000310919,0.0001650234,0.0003773564,0.00004975751,0.0001069064],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001594864,0.0001612359,0.0001653924,0.000005804113,0.000002969666,0.000003830039,0.0002787334,0.000001576777,0.9736525,0.007518235,0.002851542,0.01519866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001040495,0.0004967816,0.04452669,0.0000562883,0.00002917756,0.0002164596,0.0002550913,0.0005592775,0.7123528,0.01439674,0.2254962,0.0005740058],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9319316,0.000007311481,0.002228015,0.01166231,0.001305745,0.0005503318,0.00003798395,0.0004638133,0.05181288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825755,0.00007604748,0.0001804415,0.01425428,0.0002991389,0.0000764096,0.000006442135,0.00001702415,0.002514689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2612998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8972772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05925406828753054,"score_gpt":0.3396859002922573,"score_spread":0.2804318320047267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}