{"id":"W2025585507","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0012446","title":"Tactical Voting in Plurality Elections","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Ranked voting system; Pairwise comparison; Polarization (electrochemistry); Econometrics; Margin (machine learning); Political science; Instant-runoff voting; Voting behavior; Demographic economics; Statistics; Computer science; Group voting ticket; Economics; Law; Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004140901,0.0002158959,0.0007594621,0.0009615921,0.000824908,0.00221093,0.0005750097,0.0008360039,0.003498968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02347546,0.0002418876,0.0004869319,0.000798189,0.001350478,0.001500762,0.0009249719,0.0009636419,0.0003409137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008819565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003227585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005499809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004192377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998031,0.001037603,0.00005143575,0.0003596188,0.0001588328,0.0003615319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799509,0.01514042,0.002792004,0.0008703714,0.0005129399,0.0007333744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001856698,0.0004097478,0.5150973,0.0002647469,0.0004690955,0.001392483,0.005101926,0.1926422,0.007525105,0.1845068,0.005873196,0.08486074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009945706,0.0002435055,0.2153265,0.0000332667,0.0001041655,0.0003904116,0.001790667,0.6494573,0.001325768,0.1281719,0.002976814,0.00008020124],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904667,0.0001386497,0.005791556,0.00036424,0.00001120428,0.000009283932,0.00005871701,0.00002000621,0.00313964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999541,0.00001927742,0.0001443722,0.00001010729,0.000007475709,0.000002862093,0.00002456974,0.000002529283,0.0002477405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005499809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0218994,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.028502486852422,"score_gpt":0.2704053142099206,"score_spread":0.2419028273574986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}