{"id":"W2025600728","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.023","title":"Is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance underestimated?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Animal Behaviour","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Vigilance (psychology); Heteroscedasticity; Statistics; Magnitude (astronomy); Quantile regression; Regression; Econometrics; Psychology; Demography; Mathematics; Physics; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02267389,0.0006402047,0.001236103,0.0007926773,0.0003262979,0.0009971994,0.00172368,0.001743367,0.003619951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1090174,0.0004782549,0.000856236,0.0005004203,0.001880148,0.002677512,0.001188477,0.001664356,0.0006125987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002978804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004089579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002101748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002680334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924774,0.003421419,0.0005661488,0.00185945,0.001326759,0.0003489234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9105756,0.0602561,0.009563238,0.01441914,0.00398773,0.001198166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003224206,0.0002460261,0.6957841,0.001278926,0.00486349,0.0005913932,0.0009342759,0.001974201,0.01881314,0.006322818,0.005765059,0.2602023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001169248,0.0006669622,0.9737939,0.0002820995,0.001096105,0.001040238,0.0003106372,0.002765139,0.002739722,0.01289225,0.004253312,0.00004268567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9179432,0.01219086,0.03007326,0.02101673,0.002281972,0.00007697068,0.0008121577,0.0002817214,0.01532309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908597,0.001012589,0.003657856,0.002640065,0.0009514042,0.00002646805,0.0001504981,0.00007877822,0.00062268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02267389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1199124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01467425568272214,"score_gpt":0.2615291301385483,"score_spread":0.2468548744558262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}