{"id":"W2025824195","doi":"10.1007/s11424-008-9132-8","title":"Optimal Investment with Noise Trading Risk","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems Science and Complexity","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Dividend; Investment strategy; Investment (military); Economics; Financial economics; Dynamic programming; Bond; Security market line; Stock market; Risk premium; Risk aversion (psychology); Trading strategy; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Mathematical optimization; Finance; Mathematics; Profit (economics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001395745,0.0001000645,0.0003370794,0.0002261368,0.0004584792,0.0001287018,0.0002299026,0.00002491137,0.0000147742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006985877,0.00007670058,0.00004008144,0.0003348145,0.0009183735,0.0007966906,0.00002806421,0.0001323963,0.00000631627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009891332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001508352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003044571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989306,0.00001465324,0.0005108558,0.0001803811,0.0001493076,0.000214145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988539,0.00002005616,0.0007220685,0.00012362,0.0001346257,0.0001457166],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007867735,0.0001343258,0.1987316,0.00004712681,0.00004253,0.00005564191,0.001707702,0.000349474,0.000148658,0.7968984,0.001699733,0.0001061718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001482152,0.001697853,0.9348838,0.000157987,0.00001681171,0.001368481,0.001373468,0.01442449,0.0001143178,0.02574708,0.01827781,0.0004557195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774943,0.00164795,0.0007401608,0.0001240233,0.0003122,0.00009382429,0.00001222339,0.000005800584,0.01956951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976909,0.0003276144,0.001692422,0.000103958,0.0001071954,0.000002101523,1.469437e-7,0.000004711007,0.00007092306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7711513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3526297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08478516908215872,"score_gpt":0.2257318887031158,"score_spread":0.1409467196209571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}