{"id":"W2025828342","doi":"10.1068/b34084","title":"Evaluating Community Engagement through Argumentation Maps—A Public Participation GIS Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning B Planning and Design","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Argumentation theory; Downtown; Civic engagement; Public relations; Public participation; Public engagement; Community engagement; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01946582,0.0006660752,0.0005019621,0.002244262,0.006719192,0.004805395,0.001890406,0.002566964,0.002816552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02772263,0.0003701609,0.0004517975,0.002348527,0.003478621,0.004388533,0.005787162,0.001254911,0.0004437405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002609232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001888271,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002534675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004576486,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9730483,0.02319936,0.0003983555,0.0005926599,0.001725943,0.001035418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667822,0.0260768,0.001674672,0.001685672,0.002500624,0.001280191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008015924,0.002351129,0.0302222,0.0004520681,0.00005739334,0.006122082,0.8411236,0.003229607,0.00522527,0.01212832,0.002401089,0.09588564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001701795,0.001581345,0.01852076,0.0002489366,0.00007294514,0.001549225,0.9033513,0.01209584,0.007949001,0.008531043,0.04582485,0.0001045205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.981629,0.00005108344,0.005260545,0.0004852943,0.00001596875,0.0002888537,0.00005055392,0.00004553294,0.01217315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993292,0.00005740218,0.005132372,0.00003448948,0.00001155051,0.0002470779,0.00003767249,0.00001925046,0.001168237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01946582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1029463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4537635663240681,"score_gpt":0.4123322036443468,"score_spread":0.04143136267972131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}