{"id":"W2025828342","doi":"10.1068/b34084","title":"Evaluating Community Engagement through Argumentation Maps—A Public Participation GIS Case Study","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning B Planning and Design","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Argumentation theory; Downtown; Civic engagement; Public relations; Public participation; Public engagement; Community engagement; Sociology; Geography; Politics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003827446,0.000139298,0.0001646244,0.00008961872,0.005054204,0.0001212854,0.00006096956,0.00005512019,0.00001927273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001659289,0.0001359205,0.00001811374,0.0001057857,0.0001940879,0.0004720445,0.00006372183,0.000216537,0.000007236965],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004394214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002322509,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001829934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001693166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974283,0.001427145,0.000307677,0.0001627481,0.0004068918,0.0002672247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989321,0.0006618268,0.000178385,0.0001226149,0.00002310734,0.00008198425],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001341695,0.00007410395,0.4513554,0.000009702308,0.00005186401,0.00009896122,0.5450097,0.002085956,0.00001111001,0.00007565191,0.0003239503,0.000890242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311876,0.0006874449,0.1524609,0.00006439103,0.00008967741,0.0001288165,0.8403159,0.001380246,0.00001851273,0.0002761768,0.002888365,0.0003776995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886725,0.0004531813,0.00837238,0.00009151233,0.00008857312,0.0006220351,0.000002642652,0.00006706025,0.001630136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965349,0.00006380781,0.003022141,0.000068139,0.00005783387,0.0001006885,0.00001586603,0.00000666702,0.0001299077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2988945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4537635663240681,"score_gpt":0.4123322036443468,"score_spread":0.04143136267972131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}