{"id":"W2025832472","doi":"10.1139/a2012-009","title":"Meta-analyses of the effects of river flow on fish movement and activity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"BC Hydro; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"River ecosystem; Habitat; Discharge; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Downstream (manufacturing); Upstream and downstream (DNA); Ecology; Fishery; Geography; Hydrology (agriculture); Upstream (networking); Biology; Geology; Drainage basin; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02318258,0.002913027,0.007682408,0.005269406,0.0008998043,0.003179917,0.00286222,0.002642961,0.003642005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05125296,0.001501291,0.03814689,0.006587587,0.001046933,0.001962344,0.001661738,0.002838648,0.0004162688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00118082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001367918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005692424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981259,0.01108379,0.002568323,0.003653647,0.001020208,0.000414899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9483274,0.04246779,0.003380826,0.004257195,0.001094757,0.0004720646],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001584086,0.00002719375,0.04375203,0.0179686,0.9229705,0.0002947,0.00008250234,0.002066475,0.0007842607,0.0004988574,0.001094058,0.00887672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000331946,0.0002185708,0.03490345,0.002066189,0.9559414,0.0002228722,0.00007592272,0.001549044,0.0005086715,0.001653531,0.002487789,0.00004051491],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.1253476,0.8334276,0.02634533,0.002491378,0.001351434,0.0003034813,0.008222246,0.0006910865,0.001819865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8824286,0.09234221,0.01700559,0.001533985,0.0004276774,0.0007776758,0.004340196,0.0002964215,0.0008475903],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02318258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1226027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05347759189434696,"score_gpt":0.275531306357534,"score_spread":0.2220537144631871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}