{"id":"W2026045177","doi":"10.1117/1.3265713","title":"Specification of efficient block-matching scheme for motion estimation in video compression","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optical Engineering","topic":"Video Coding and Compression Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Motion estimation; Computer science; Block-matching algorithm; Motion vector; Block (permutation group theory); Quarter-pixel motion; Matching (statistics); Search algorithm; Data compression; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Motion compensation; Computer vision; Video tracking; Video processing; Mathematics; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008535238,0.0003476042,0.0004662208,0.0005552573,0.0002218026,0.0004345303,0.000879106,0.0005294212,0.0009112361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002630147,0.0002269951,0.0002067556,0.0008009063,0.000238438,0.000846723,0.0004398016,0.0004120829,0.0004822932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003671626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006811624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000808072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009302505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99944,0.0001316971,0.00005629108,0.00006960666,0.000269636,0.0000328363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994162,0.0001636358,0.00006768788,0.0001216739,0.0002099233,0.00002091544],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027397,0.0001110111,0.001131136,0.000258941,0.00004288473,0.0001138375,0.0001464794,0.09186193,0.2400993,0.0554537,0.002196111,0.6083107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004406574,0.0001715411,0.0004059199,0.00001830246,0.00001364255,0.0002219401,0.00001516142,0.9291889,0.05891971,0.005216993,0.005763821,0.00001994319],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006705588,0.0001280866,0.9925777,0.00001349301,0.000009529147,0.00005829895,0.00001699633,0.0001170649,0.0003731052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1101155,0.0002006882,0.8884357,0.00002206814,0.00001638706,0.0002037934,0.000151465,0.00003995253,0.0008144625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009112361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004513919,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01350344370502289,"score_gpt":0.2430006667324815,"score_spread":0.2294972230274586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}