{"id":"W2026070554","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.12650","title":"Microscopic Saw Mark Analysis: An Empirical Approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Word error rate; Random forest; Statistical analysis; Statistics; Computer science; Decision tree; Outcome (game theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01680949,0.0007627379,0.0004452543,0.004061349,0.0011668,0.002331524,0.002074667,0.0008765849,0.002724409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05434626,0.0004668941,0.0005165209,0.002389325,0.003688997,0.00261055,0.001772846,0.001083356,0.000598493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001888346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002100348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002498809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004181297,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884029,0.004278056,0.0005581417,0.001346791,0.005182731,0.0002314197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647363,0.02059427,0.003850859,0.002924671,0.00765681,0.0002370431],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003875349,0.001064652,0.3246197,0.001630259,0.0003424393,0.0007221411,0.010877,0.03641845,0.01626522,0.09896529,0.003580247,0.505127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001026669,0.003352755,0.266723,0.002217987,0.0004471278,0.002744083,0.03095553,0.4093369,0.03308456,0.1936408,0.05703135,0.0003632306],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3083903,0.0005885196,0.6680301,0.0009296104,0.00007281424,0.001872606,0.0005210511,0.0002175223,0.01937741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7683298,0.0007156816,0.2262574,0.0001554172,0.00005859806,0.0009270742,0.0002513702,0.00006200313,0.003242649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01680949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08889818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0572522647339377,"score_gpt":0.3256773032239108,"score_spread":0.2684250384899731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}