{"id":"W2026144548","doi":"10.1016/s0828-282x(09)70124-2","title":"Effectiveness of a change in reperfusion strategy to primary percutaneous coronary intervention in a nonselected population","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Acute Myocardial Infarction Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Conventional PCI; Myocardial infarction; Killip class; Cohort; Stroke (engine); Population; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Retrospective cohort study; Incidence (geometry); Cardiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211009,0.000481291,0.001256127,0.000469907,0.0004597004,0.0006398881,0.0005069582,0.001421124,0.002891277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005382502,0.0001966122,0.002061907,0.0003943992,0.0004410284,0.0006723807,0.0004402041,0.000980344,0.0002070242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008560508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001236808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005531295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006417787,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987035,0.000529758,0.00009291014,0.0002716907,0.000124319,0.0002778939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978083,0.001115254,0.0002725173,0.0001276014,0.0001027274,0.0005735991],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.3392965,0.04294701,0.4689608,0.0005116923,0.005166864,0.001952958,0.0006562301,0.005955725,0.003997789,0.0007925038,0.002418489,0.1273435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02833332,0.1302151,0.8241987,0.00009893072,0.004185941,0.0007601241,0.000778723,0.008989036,0.0009044211,0.0007482895,0.0007024129,0.0000849674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998417,0.0003413169,0.00005461073,0.0002784562,0.00006531499,0.00003185312,0.00008584593,0.000005530525,0.0007200578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992385,0.0001421918,0.00008493326,0.0001815471,0.00009184526,0.00001820415,0.0001336438,0.000001223059,0.0001079655],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005531295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01099819,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0322838116332767,"score_gpt":0.3233762339903082,"score_spread":0.2910924223570315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}