{"id":"W2026186204","doi":"10.1177/1748048510386745","title":"Picturing environmental risk: The Canadian oil sands and the National Geographic","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Communication Gazette","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Geographic Society","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Environmental communication; Sublime; Oil sands; Visual communication; Risk communication; Public opinion; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Business; Aesthetics; Advertising; Environmental science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Archaeology; Law; Art","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001206802,0.0005536742,0.0001819855,0.001746409,0.01802125,0.008731036,0.0008544958,0.001704052,0.006310291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00330857,0.0002293975,0.0002128248,0.002541369,0.01544466,0.002695099,0.002788363,0.002338476,0.0002984381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04249341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02983914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987808,0.0003509735,0.00001660585,0.00008178534,0.0005243463,0.0002455291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988507,0.0004121054,0.0001014311,0.00005197945,0.0004341387,0.0001495722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006486262,0.00002647064,0.005249805,0.0002229386,0.00002067381,0.001324536,0.6209527,0.0008094624,0.001596402,0.1913928,0.09568459,0.08265483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006277174,0.00001642448,0.008877741,0.0003276856,0.00002339689,0.0003091825,0.4303643,0.0003088992,0.0006115155,0.007426369,0.5516657,0.00006245928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.230978,0.01032336,0.003993522,0.09501507,0.001321251,0.00003995499,0.0003274805,0.0001276676,0.6578739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959598,0.004263692,0.00134041,0.002155544,0.0001237309,0.00001361791,0.00006325206,0.00004773979,0.03239395],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04249341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3083128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.281834658813666,"score_gpt":0.3680020322994229,"score_spread":0.08616737348575682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}