{"id":"W2026194364","doi":"10.4236/ojf.2014.41005","title":"Is Evidence-Based Conservation Applied in Urban Forestry? A Case Study from Toronto, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Forestry","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Forest management; Geography; Scientific evidence; Nature Conservation; Scale (ratio); Urban forestry; Environmental resource management; Tree (set theory); Scientific literature; Environmental planning; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Cartography; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007421124,0.0001333391,0.0002810823,0.00001922292,0.0001096798,0.00008124949,0.0006926393,0.00005568741,0.001381479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007513093,0.0001137664,0.00003399019,0.0001153457,0.0000446599,0.0006145674,0.0001712667,0.0002192552,0.00001039194],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007328685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000497119,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998508,0.0001058394,0.0004825265,0.0002043262,0.000461521,0.0002377559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988214,0.0001817822,0.0003899562,0.000369419,0.00001992005,0.0002175534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000126821,0.0001104522,0.9668656,0.000004303352,0.00001008306,0.000545319,0.0005802927,0.0002323215,0.00004190513,0.000009658989,0.03029765,0.001175567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001984012,0.0004887177,0.9897641,0.0001303059,0.0000340939,0.0001111832,0.003160907,0.00130217,0.00007568367,0.0002722307,0.002491946,0.0001846391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996846,0.00008976697,0.00007924829,0.001246992,0.00009190429,0.0003972677,0.000006247203,0.00000220782,0.001240405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967885,0.000006737638,0.001076819,0.001910823,0.00008896964,0.000009938448,0.000001460527,0.0000112301,0.0001055097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02780571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995314,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04229833246813355,"score_gpt":0.2888650721793293,"score_spread":0.2465667397111957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}