{"id":"W2026218910","doi":"10.1016/j.bone.2014.11.023","title":"A comparison of methods for in vivo assessment of cortical porosity in the human appendicular skeleton","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bone","topic":"Medical Imaging and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute","funders":"Merck Canada; Health Research Board","keywords":"Appendicular skeleton; Porosity; Skeleton (computer programming); Human skeleton; In vivo; Chemistry; Anatomy; Medicine; Biology; Organic chemistry; Biotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002696697,0.0005344814,0.0005977477,0.002633438,0.0002920626,0.001153904,0.0007011644,0.0008415162,0.00128252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007202205,0.0005393564,0.0003117563,0.001017248,0.0005657584,0.0007785491,0.000593651,0.0005246699,0.0002168602],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003851112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005027609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001839759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002991583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998924,0.0003379148,0.00006255136,0.000134155,0.0005083846,0.00003302764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941429,0.003565313,0.0005519432,0.000434061,0.001206371,0.00009939076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004848471,0.0003566153,0.04471812,0.002091289,0.0005747421,0.0002669715,0.001453619,0.01254182,0.6131563,0.002338353,0.0005940655,0.3170597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002718843,0.001796973,0.1966262,0.0003396871,0.0009116939,0.007423206,0.001188362,0.1746657,0.6046518,0.002801544,0.008948821,0.0003740821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5375692,0.01090875,0.445973,0.0001830502,0.00009923893,0.000211216,0.0006461007,0.0005690543,0.003840291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8108175,0.005447782,0.1807427,0.00006732986,0.00005320757,0.0001787955,0.0002902999,0.000302026,0.002100475],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002696697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01426166,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03491787954485751,"score_gpt":0.4217299062403033,"score_spread":0.3868120266954458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}