{"id":"W2026255350","doi":"10.4309/jgi.2005.14.4","title":"Interpreting prevalence estimates of pathological gambling: Implications for policy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Issues","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive value; Pathological; Statistics; Value (mathematics); Confidence interval; Psychology; Econometrics; Medicine; Mathematics; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1873949,0.002528482,0.003710236,0.01330144,0.002406025,0.01162402,0.005584107,0.009698987,0.007543282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6487191,0.001362822,0.001868588,0.01197434,0.007081325,0.01451108,0.004745062,0.008778295,0.001901956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008897909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01133441,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03662673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01998745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7560474,0.2163729,0.01044024,0.004863671,0.01071756,0.001558217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3425156,0.5896508,0.02179253,0.009827863,0.03402939,0.002183883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007870432,0.0004369749,0.07356617,0.007050295,0.001066972,0.001421844,0.008373673,0.02830071,0.000657282,0.4313973,0.1277036,0.3192382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003727987,0.0004276124,0.03085466,0.02322176,0.0005999205,0.000970251,0.01656358,0.06039394,0.001141366,0.7979048,0.06707775,0.0004715166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02352756,0.03466938,0.3434773,0.5505673,0.00856241,0.002115258,0.003562209,0.0008727179,0.03264581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4506718,0.0327318,0.4090018,0.0805525,0.01115941,0.007840827,0.001779175,0.0004771175,0.005785669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8126051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3393819203325172,"score_gpt":0.5298343707517069,"score_spread":0.1904524504191897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}