{"id":"W2026258470","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.002","title":"Community forests for forest communities: Integrating community-defined goals and practices in the design of forestry initiatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Land Use Policy","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Community forestry; Livelihood; Psychological intervention; Forest management; Environmental planning; Forestry; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Intervention (counseling); Environmental resource management; Community development; Agriculture; Geography; Economic growth; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0376074,0.0005911066,0.000522535,0.003120499,0.01032206,0.0129763,0.002404461,0.003527955,0.00313459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04733623,0.0005905978,0.0004239149,0.003079997,0.006881724,0.01017942,0.01022435,0.003041636,0.0003321889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01169735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05423834,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0194349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101989,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790773,0.01362042,0.0006172445,0.0007170958,0.003907282,0.002060706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97714,0.009425136,0.002366946,0.001752026,0.003888062,0.005427897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108112,0.0007694445,0.02054568,0.0006422815,0.00008392239,0.0002592577,0.02605702,0.01671801,0.001337028,0.6249599,0.0127174,0.2958019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001113805,0.0004268799,0.02097206,0.002588075,0.0001813411,0.0002679066,0.06625263,0.03007412,0.002462285,0.728574,0.1479074,0.0001818499],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2969293,0.003868622,0.3903528,0.06041436,0.0003765622,0.003391014,0.0003048571,0.0006704991,0.2436921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8150334,0.0006780362,0.1797384,0.0008455028,0.00002808731,0.001120135,0.00007697278,0.0000897416,0.002389874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0376074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1988893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1144890084033985,"score_gpt":0.3128814950150255,"score_spread":0.1983924866116271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}