{"id":"W2026272710","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.11.009","title":"Activity of novel nicotinic anthelmintics in cut preparations of Caenorhabditis elegans","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Parasitology","topic":"Helminth infection and control","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Anthelmintic; Biology; Caenorhabditis elegans; Mecamylamine; Pharmacology; Nematode; Nicotinic agonist; Nicotine; Nicotinic Antagonist; Antagonism; Acetylcholine receptor; Receptor; Biochemistry; Zoology; Neuroscience; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002944893,0.00009778352,0.0002597157,0.0002842461,0.00004287218,0.00001531323,0.0002948926,0.0001379951,0.0002549157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000491087,0.00009644936,0.0001638507,0.00007531411,0.0001080947,0.0001602591,0.00002975062,0.0003520783,0.000007904549],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003657151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000139534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001234562,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989471,0.00005085382,0.0005262333,0.0001334992,0.0001789915,0.0001632511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985679,0.0003563508,0.0004220851,0.0001312605,0.0004685336,0.0000538777],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001789573,0.001756174,0.1157596,0.00002306838,0.0003848588,0.00004872444,0.0005752587,0.0001841901,0.8481357,0.0219633,0.0008860141,0.008493586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01790873,0.004786046,0.6228458,0.0002043237,0.0001964584,0.01809448,0.000355974,0.03493426,0.2383667,0.006771009,0.05467759,0.0008586328],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.979566,0.000008093172,0.01415142,0.0007094782,0.003865622,0.0001606272,0.0001272981,0.000009566575,0.001401906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984918,0.00001133655,0.0009663964,0.00005061464,0.000298846,0.00002047218,0.0000066237,0.00001100796,0.0001429583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.609769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3933091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05357023176936889,"score_gpt":0.4413503819507569,"score_spread":0.3877801501813881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}