{"id":"W2026278481","doi":"10.1177/0020702014525899","title":"Still notable: Reassessing theoretical “exceptions” in Canadian foreign policy literature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Positive economics; Foreign policy; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Politics; Economics; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03106727,0.0005941063,0.0009641783,0.01214324,0.03299841,0.02789044,0.006383422,0.00591388,0.004040399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05295285,0.0004895738,0.0006771461,0.01584869,0.06385914,0.01161971,0.008426446,0.01274171,0.000272171],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1592545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.176562,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9412199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9491914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9730486,0.005261489,0.0008230471,0.003670662,0.01207178,0.005124513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9472709,0.02400952,0.002177124,0.003000112,0.02045353,0.003088809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002128349,0.00001085781,0.00186294,0.0001486234,0.0000102792,0.0001590543,0.05477601,0.0003285383,0.0000768794,0.8964394,0.02202391,0.02414225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002396474,0.00002392774,0.01113137,0.00227175,0.00006522621,0.0002424548,0.1692047,0.002127586,0.0005530033,0.2272298,0.5869563,0.0001700383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.08705123,0.0363615,0.007300063,0.6437601,0.003712408,0.00004180581,0.0003020058,0.0001733146,0.2212977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504101,0.01132408,0.003653789,0.02588338,0.001040351,0.00004042151,0.0001540424,0.0001076818,0.007386343],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8407455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9751456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005276120534330822,"score_gpt":0.3112640210784999,"score_spread":0.3059879005441691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}