{"id":"W2026278481","doi":"10.1177/0020702014525899","title":"Still notable: Reassessing theoretical “exceptions” in Canadian foreign policy literature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Positive economics; Foreign policy; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Politics; Economics; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950749,0.0002287986,0.0004949538,0.001721569,0.0003376102,0.0007649526,0.001283718,0.0001823654,0.0003465436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005847489,0.0002187296,0.0004305276,0.003973771,0.0003165773,0.0007026955,0.00003906198,0.0007138524,0.000002599411],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01328514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02986086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9986953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955104,0.000565971,0.0009506873,0.0001973273,0.00182749,0.0009481405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955514,0.0002195784,0.0007999131,0.0001789248,0.001468799,0.001781378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000710603,0.00003481837,0.0412707,0.000003166257,0.000789344,0.0008215181,0.000779333,0.003483597,0.000003495996,0.9032839,0.04434277,0.00511633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007793004,0.00004825795,0.110797,0.000202901,0.0002649926,0.0008761256,0.0004325817,0.0006162064,0.000003096933,0.1277199,0.7578955,0.0003641533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2043056,0.001301192,0.00174346,0.6941887,0.001534284,0.0001636301,0.001824035,0.00001442813,0.09492473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978597,0.0003354695,0.0001838013,0.01506331,0.005539002,8.535254e-7,0.000007683415,0.00001160194,0.0002612763],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.775564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005276120534330822,"score_gpt":0.3112640210784999,"score_spread":0.3059879005441691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}