{"id":"W2026300665","doi":"10.1016/j.tig.2012.07.001","title":"Cancer heterogeneity: origins and implications for genetic association studies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trends in Genetics","topic":"Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"U.S. National Library of Medicine; National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases","keywords":"Biology; Genetic association; Epigenetics; Cancer; Association (psychology); Disease; Genetic heterogeneity; Genetic variation; Epigenesis; Genome-wide association study; Genetics; Computational biology; Genetic variants; Evolutionary biology; Phenotype; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Genotype; Gene; DNA methylation; Psychology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008517853,0.0003938434,0.001351812,0.004775089,0.0009897635,0.002855229,0.001421494,0.001444379,0.002989091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03049983,0.0003934962,0.0006098014,0.005028333,0.00352135,0.00261738,0.001904901,0.001919353,0.0002305698],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00108084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006730978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003706404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003183972,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941611,0.002255837,0.0004086042,0.001823765,0.0009818072,0.0003689385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975183,0.01819779,0.002509511,0.002349133,0.001042131,0.0007184731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005737306,0.0001405317,0.8263845,0.0003755078,0.00115025,0.002684078,0.002807302,0.0009894432,0.007681216,0.06446491,0.002181732,0.09056672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001150701,0.0001981049,0.7930809,0.0002456691,0.001066595,0.01022096,0.003247996,0.003626102,0.002231577,0.1720311,0.01380307,0.0001328003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.8779493,0.05529082,0.03174531,0.02152193,0.0003371574,0.0001177524,0.001333008,0.0001604683,0.01154425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886142,0.00508501,0.0040834,0.0009289442,0.0004470959,0.00002875379,0.000232618,0.0000383871,0.0005416822],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008517853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04504722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04288993028452547,"score_gpt":0.3663142963422895,"score_spread":0.323424366057764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}