{"id":"W2026316860","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.1.23","title":"JUDICIAL RESTRAINT IN THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial restraint; Adjudication; Political science; Worry; Economic Justice; Law; Reputation; Honesty; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04666027,0.0004182651,0.001086298,0.001552219,0.01260888,0.01054426,0.0027329,0.01120593,0.002197915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0869721,0.0006305363,0.0006793167,0.001829749,0.03695511,0.007234404,0.01066469,0.01227491,0.0007065207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007533485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0168808,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01527244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01669539,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9309528,0.03795827,0.003642136,0.004483846,0.01583651,0.00712653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292519,0.04777814,0.006793062,0.006607839,0.007409347,0.002159655],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002358227,0.00001325573,0.0009412402,0.00004091278,0.00001765166,0.0002518738,0.01015809,0.0003156013,0.0003465072,0.9782956,0.002433382,0.007162228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007681354,0.00007011327,0.002704469,0.000479998,0.00003824713,0.0003090634,0.007678965,0.001100646,0.0006177738,0.8874789,0.09936465,0.00008034373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1931983,0.01375203,0.06661929,0.1499896,0.001374768,0.0002581762,0.00005973738,0.0001419703,0.5746061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816409,0.001107797,0.003037019,0.007291207,0.0005264177,0.00008639534,0.000009491355,0.00003250713,0.00626817],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04666027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2467661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01814470664394893,"score_gpt":0.2609374646323454,"score_spread":0.2427927579883964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}