{"id":"W2026409045","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.09.004","title":"Environmental assessment framework for identifying and mitigating the effects of linear development to wetlands","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape and Urban Planning","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Cumulative effects; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Context (archaeology); Environmental impact assessment; Wetland conservation; Impact assessment; Environmental science; Scale (ratio); Landscape ecology; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002190639,0.0001438114,0.0001577225,0.00002051573,0.0004092939,0.00004261471,0.0001132247,0.00007581061,0.00007662523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003564732,0.0001051924,0.00002931807,0.00005155802,0.00009402271,0.0001102952,0.0002128165,0.0002001336,0.000007265907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002217231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005128209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004909799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003984727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991156,0.00002126464,0.0001855499,0.0002284427,0.0002061276,0.0002429889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993731,0.0002953224,0.00008500698,0.0001143687,0.000001149056,0.0001310832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009115232,0.00003332043,0.9401749,0.00003452208,0.00002167269,0.000002463627,0.004649801,0.00000952524,0.05186458,0.00006921598,0.0001768146,0.002954115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004025039,0.0001241301,0.9883917,0.00008508584,0.00002965369,0.000006915237,0.001094853,0.0003184391,0.00693493,0.0003258166,0.002096216,0.0001897324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960485,0.00007771945,0.0027789,0.00007020415,0.000159379,0.000338169,0.000007758191,0.00001036516,0.0005090371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731004,0.00001146386,0.02639422,0.0002144407,0.00008209275,0.0000475054,0.00001120234,0.00001456789,0.0001240695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04821687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4289621,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0105735710011463,"score_gpt":0.2858244030478121,"score_spread":0.2752508320466658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}