{"id":"W2026457074","doi":"10.1118/1.2031035","title":"Sci‐PM Fri ‐ 03: Potential use of diffusion theory for quantitative <i>in vivo</i> fluorescence and bioluminescence imaging","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Juravinski Cancer Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Monte Carlo method; Optics; Diffusion; Biomedical engineering; Charge-coupled device; Point source; Heavy traffic approximation; Instrumentation (computer programming); Physics; Materials science; Biological system; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325619,0.0006286537,0.0003379912,0.0007234477,0.0002298911,0.0007084025,0.0008048234,0.0007156187,0.004300278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001704045,0.0002764371,0.0004309862,0.0003947413,0.000795585,0.001066926,0.000560939,0.0007602781,0.0009410461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001185145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005527502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001459483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001205331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997798,0.00007754818,0.00000692495,0.00004247227,0.00007592543,0.00001734727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995147,0.00023835,0.00004635973,0.00005695735,0.0001049081,0.00003880008],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004730992,0.0001814001,0.001923557,0.0005090365,0.00007612386,0.0002976725,0.0001688255,0.05878516,0.673997,0.09561279,0.005644569,0.1623307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007105934,0.0003531128,0.001806277,0.00005571935,0.00003391127,0.0005131147,0.00004443376,0.7507563,0.2030839,0.02204102,0.02114667,0.00009455204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02643404,0.001254588,0.9574408,0.001342099,0.0001656813,0.00009698904,0.00026023,0.002733024,0.01027257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3171659,0.001850746,0.6707236,0.0004095681,0.0001185867,0.000164825,0.0003614952,0.0004753437,0.008729916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004300278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01438582,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01641716883381758,"score_gpt":0.3157681579794737,"score_spread":0.2993509891456562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}