{"id":"W2026470071","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.006","title":"Rethinking John Snow's South London study: A Bayesian evaluation and recalculation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Vibrio bacteria research studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Snow; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Sine qua non; Bayes' theorem; Population; Social science; Bayesian probability; Geography; Demography; Statistics; Meteorology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Medicine; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002365129,0.00009074841,0.0001205848,0.00007412574,0.000542452,0.00003431104,0.0001262874,0.00005267628,0.0000162357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000849839,0.00007277007,0.00001734128,0.0003401014,0.0007532866,0.0000115795,0.00009640398,0.00007093887,7.875579e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005976261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001311053,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002151956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000186369,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983766,0.000121781,0.0001569351,0.0003504008,0.000745739,0.0002485433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994673,0.00001235577,0.0000752293,0.0001216798,0.0002710608,0.00005234259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007964109,0.00007377288,0.09080829,0.00001181743,0.0000224285,0.000003213366,0.0171754,0.0000069197,0.8531675,0.0002537881,0.0008300749,0.03756711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00308559,0.001042639,0.9726019,0.00005969485,0.00009456642,0.000004585955,0.004374347,0.0008482795,0.01185249,0.004230799,0.001483968,0.0003211488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995085,0.0002214646,0.0004260321,0.0009938807,0.0001193391,0.0004135557,0.00000129093,0.00001083664,0.002728596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989435,0.00001306906,0.00003760139,0.00006819172,0.0008124546,0.00002178251,0.00002178905,0.000006142802,0.00007547277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8817936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4172157,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02775527039499954,"score_gpt":0.348413943988449,"score_spread":0.3206586735934495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}