{"id":"W2026540296","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.005","title":"Institutional fit and the sustainability of social–ecological systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":353,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre; ArcticNet","keywords":"Typology; Sustainability; Diversity (politics); Set (abstract data type); Ecology; Ecological systems theory; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Management science; Computer science; Engineering; Economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001735054,0.0001783212,0.0003139786,0.00002864219,0.0001850671,0.00002671805,0.0002623296,0.00009675712,0.0001782349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001908215,0.0001162249,0.00007479663,0.0001682249,0.0008828675,0.0002668311,0.000593534,0.0001948277,0.00001605156],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001850653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006339396,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006109843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002782588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978802,0.0004615867,0.0005045966,0.0004059983,0.000421367,0.0003263064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.0001318045,0.0001560788,0.0002568978,0.0000169402,0.0001239438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002798041,0.0007819951,0.9813551,0.0005045126,0.000008122023,0.000001048925,0.001953126,0.008382679,0.000001324876,0.00345679,0.0003226274,0.002952884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002513496,0.00008375086,0.9422951,0.00001599515,0.00001072179,0.000007271417,0.007387053,0.006936482,0.000002749975,0.01168079,0.02885753,0.0002091067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961134,0.0009062453,0.00005521407,0.0008558027,0.0006241013,0.00109992,0.00002094425,0.00001604606,0.0003083661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996488,0.00007813087,0.000005153451,0.000009728625,0.00006930614,0.0001515583,0.0000185047,0.000005637676,0.00001318857],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03906003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4839393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02823851551128827,"score_gpt":0.286421752226719,"score_spread":0.2581832367154308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}