{"id":"W2026547416","doi":"10.2307/4127368","title":"Hegemony of Homogeneity: An Anthropological Analysis of Nihonjinron.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":332,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homogeneity (statistics); Hegemony; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Statistics; Mathematics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03471144766166036,"score_gpt":0.284641997419974,"score_spread":0.2499305497583137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."},"direct_labels":[],"classifier":{"requested":true,"available":true,"version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","frame_rows_covered":4299418,"decision_targets":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","randomized_trial","nonrandomized_trial","observational","systematic_review","meta_analysis","case_report","qualitative","simulation_or_modeling","bench_or_experimental","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame.","warning":null},"prediction":{"classifier_version":"metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90","candidate_union":["sts","qualitative","theoretical_or_conceptual","not_applicable"],"consensus_intersection":["qualitative","not_applicable"],"score_encoding":"uint16_le_65535","score_resolution":0.000015259021896696422,"scores":{"codex":{"metaresearch":0.00030518043793392844,"metaepi_narrow":0.000045777065690089265,"metaepi_broad":0.0001373311970702678,"bibliometrics":0.00044251163500419623,"sts":0.22502479591058214,"scholarly_communication":0.00007629510948348211,"open_science":0.000015259021896696422,"research_integrity":0.00006103608758678569,"randomized_trial":0.000030518043793392844,"nonrandomized_trial":0.00009155413138017853,"observational":0.0005493247882810712,"systematic_review":0.000015259021896696422,"meta_analysis":0.0006103608758678569,"case_report":0.000030518043793392844,"qualitative":0.33400473029678796,"simulation_or_modeling":0.00006103608758678569,"bench_or_experimental":0.0017547875181200886,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.21118486305027848,"not_applicable":0.12916762035553522,"design_other":0.000976577401388571},"gemma":{"metaresearch":0.00010681315327687495,"metaepi_narrow":0.000015259021896696422,"metaepi_broad":0.00006103608758678569,"bibliometrics":0.0007324330510414282,"sts":0.020202944991226063,"scholarly_communication":0.000030518043793392844,"open_science":0.000045777065690089265,"research_integrity":0.000030518043793392844,"randomized_trial":0,"nonrandomized_trial":0.00007629510948348211,"observational":0.0014496070801861601,"systematic_review":0.000015259021896696422,"meta_analysis":0.000503547722590982,"case_report":0.000030518043793392844,"qualitative":0.797039749752041,"simulation_or_modeling":0.0010223544670786603,"bench_or_experimental":0.0002746623941405356,"theoretical_or_conceptual":0.0018158236057068742,"not_applicable":0.3470969710841535}},"interpretation":"Scores imitate each teacher on the enriched screening sample; they are not calibrated prevalence probabilities for the full frame."}}