{"id":"W2026699778","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1348","title":"Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Cultural and spiritual perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","keywords":"Indigenous; Sustenance; Environmental ethics; Natural (archaeology); Natural resource; Cultural heritage; Resource (disambiguation); Sociology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Environmental science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003428485,0.0003636649,0.0002070512,0.00004640468,0.0002439156,0.00009745413,0.0001516158,0.00006618987,0.0006578061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003427271,0.0002437469,0.00003475901,0.0000999566,0.0009911396,0.0005914355,0.0005347376,0.0003260963,0.00007023778],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003322836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001981734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004596585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003970239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980189,0.0001497867,0.0002389494,0.0005522677,0.0004439931,0.0005960547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994969,0.00004075663,0.00005627025,0.0001549196,8.287741e-7,0.0002502678],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006904521,0.001607318,0.8480929,0.0001552052,0.0001386713,0.00007318977,0.02181598,0.00001740304,0.0262458,0.001761037,0.0008186345,0.09920484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001180924,0.0001476773,0.898408,0.00003178353,0.0001367546,0.00006352041,0.0643319,0.0003366481,0.0008701548,0.00004827583,0.03399337,0.0004509803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872491,0.003893745,0.00003394025,0.001362356,0.0000517697,0.0007863047,0.00002326066,0.00002050451,0.006579015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988813,0.008854725,0.001278054,0.000678056,0.00003926313,0.00004593212,0.00003335912,0.00001891226,0.0002387346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09875385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03494045804719296,"score_gpt":0.3219753862867564,"score_spread":0.2870349282395634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}