{"id":"W2026735560","doi":"10.1177/000842980603500305","title":"Religion as the academic's enemy: A case study of an ineffective discursive strategy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Adversary; Hermeneutics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Sociology; Relation (database); Phenomenology (philosophy); Binary opposition; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001009336,0.0004942941,0.0006950879,0.0004420088,0.001572777,0.0001400997,0.000822799,0.0001205622,0.000009637223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000295078,0.0003066855,0.0001624207,0.0006245637,0.00292562,0.0005626917,0.0003179769,0.0005415116,0.0000208588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009928702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001932342,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06479208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02931312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962439,0.0004679179,0.0009846361,0.0008549045,0.0008556152,0.0005930538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973458,0.001144656,0.0005139008,0.0005464847,0.0003777214,0.00007145023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004823008,0.002814467,0.01264311,0.0002289457,0.0004428926,0.00258835,0.3072653,0.005198077,0.0001294456,0.6146904,0.05205149,0.001465311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002403836,0.01174233,0.00100336,0.0005589835,0.0003611989,0.001007028,0.6354038,0.00008326528,0.0006393229,0.3316919,0.01387349,0.001231487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9396517,0.02421671,9.666412e-7,0.0006346758,0.0009385824,0.001342797,0.00001422523,0.0001075465,0.03309277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903752,0.008060426,0.0000171029,0.0002639523,0.0008292897,0.0002379512,0.000003334426,0.00002878437,0.0001839644],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3281385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999385,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09806326230361476,"score_gpt":0.3779893411771403,"score_spread":0.2799260788735256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}