{"id":"W2026735560","doi":"10.1177/000842980603500305","title":"Religion as the academic's enemy: A case study of an ineffective discursive strategy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Study and Philosophy of Religion","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Adversary; Hermeneutics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Sociology; Relation (database); Phenomenology (philosophy); Binary opposition; Philosophy; Political science; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0232451,0.0008967876,0.00125326,0.0047308,0.05999887,0.01592977,0.004944006,0.01034084,0.004761012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0528092,0.0006298645,0.000729672,0.007745048,0.03083026,0.006993837,0.01081009,0.0103021,0.0009854471],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03221608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02387457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1246693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2293693,"domain_scores_codex":[0.96644,0.0246441,0.0006516353,0.001096472,0.003998421,0.003169469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505191,0.03126211,0.003550577,0.002365787,0.004287072,0.008015256],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006157104,0.0004046591,0.004120829,0.0001400978,0.00001286674,0.01204583,0.8974234,0.000187913,0.0003869686,0.07063131,0.005053295,0.009531218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003009746,0.00007929581,0.001497997,0.000168942,0.00002106888,0.001941705,0.9304172,0.0004551871,0.0005539737,0.005939928,0.05886367,0.00003087074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8552843,0.002171038,0.005372647,0.06036328,0.0005102569,0.0003527154,0.0001129791,0.00009727511,0.07573541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793726,0.001520304,0.002956739,0.003347239,0.0001540543,0.0001373683,0.00002594242,0.0000784972,0.0124072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2478872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09806326230361476,"score_gpt":0.3779893411771403,"score_spread":0.2799260788735256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}