{"id":"W2026816789","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2003.tb00171.x","title":"Duck Hunting and Wetland Conservation: Compromise or Synergy?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Compromise; Geography; Incentive; Wildlife; Welfare economics; Profit (economics); Cost–benefit analysis; Ethnology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003514269,0.0004230066,0.0009337461,0.002363984,0.0008440953,0.006032121,0.0008536307,0.002486803,0.01427958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009630323,0.0002958087,0.0004200143,0.002441248,0.005588772,0.01238896,0.007620222,0.00169712,0.0007401779],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001626901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001174464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008033851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001828817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968498,0.001733251,0.0001084527,0.000278531,0.0005640659,0.0004657275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907047,0.005100213,0.001799176,0.0007398719,0.000590245,0.001065754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006037143,0.0003579335,0.05482786,0.000774801,0.0004829944,0.001496564,0.004524285,0.005147955,0.001878713,0.5949357,0.007264444,0.3277051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004385043,0.0003180807,0.04642856,0.0007112041,0.0001558423,0.002125769,0.01361507,0.004516577,0.0004807603,0.8976152,0.03392407,0.00006507491],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4529918,0.04664807,0.02308211,0.1090818,0.0004519145,0.00005912224,0.0001181493,0.00007737033,0.3674895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863461,0.005122996,0.001518216,0.001182209,0.0002840751,0.00001621528,0.00002146472,0.00000737226,0.005501251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04776996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07144195971952283,"score_gpt":0.1625161228343482,"score_spread":0.09107416311482536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}