{"id":"W2026816789","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2003.tb00171.x","title":"Duck Hunting and Wetland Conservation: Compromise or Synergy?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Compromise; Geography; Incentive; Wildlife; Welfare economics; Profit (economics); Cost–benefit analysis; Ethnology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Ecology; Economics; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007823927,0.0003209075,0.0007774837,0.0003294476,0.000310544,0.0002379943,0.0002967815,0.0001736194,0.001527045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002040788,0.0003130954,0.0001843631,0.0001036431,0.0001676178,0.0009014465,0.00001936829,0.0002580012,0.0001583016],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001347436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002704733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01920926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4102961,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974144,0.00003270824,0.001431873,0.0004604431,0.000006660388,0.0006539687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972842,0.0001102917,0.001185353,0.0002328109,0.00004976474,0.001137567],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000530191,0.00003912671,0.6107195,0.00008214439,0.0004358513,0.00006182797,0.00204442,0.004319578,0.00005372822,0.3770216,0.004433845,0.0007353369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003032381,0.0005162947,0.8238713,0.0000982078,0.00007209246,0.00192005,0.003528536,0.0005738946,0.0001493315,0.01935581,0.1456037,0.001278422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892289,0.001020995,0.00002483026,0.002372833,0.001220097,0.0002228121,0.0001437914,0.000007360834,0.005758353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957037,0.0002827832,0.0007615699,0.000668285,0.0003128156,0.0000106316,0.00003208975,0.00003221557,0.00219589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3910868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07144195971952283,"score_gpt":0.1625161228343482,"score_spread":0.09107416311482536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}