{"id":"W2026861531","doi":"10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00920.x","title":"A case study of habitat compensation to ameliorate impacts of hydroelectric development: effectiveness of re‐watering and habitat enhancement of an intermittent flood overflow channel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Fish Biology","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Salmo; Channel (broadcasting); Fishery; Floodplain; Ecology; Nursery habitat; Population; Hydrology (agriculture); Flood myth; Trout; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00100603,0.0003854535,0.0002202909,0.0003733154,0.001227157,0.0005832565,0.0007810292,0.0006960853,0.0007320232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00147569,0.0001412266,0.0003305599,0.0006547565,0.0007046097,0.0004459156,0.0005573677,0.0003603028,0.00005929652],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002396392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001760079,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06000975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2119592,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999501,0.0001968991,0.00001673227,0.00004583591,0.00007684882,0.0001627203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989622,0.0002996359,0.0001917761,0.00009283667,0.000183178,0.0002705131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003109695,0.005450358,0.7046995,0.0005653712,0.000405441,0.0412582,0.01161815,0.05207884,0.03106197,0.003642169,0.0045201,0.1415903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006259932,0.01433994,0.8787594,0.00009211724,0.0002815972,0.007975681,0.02382729,0.04301533,0.01795297,0.0009824495,0.01200434,0.0001427819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989325,0.00002537924,0.0001764272,0.00005610192,0.000001534412,0.00002676571,0.00002175294,0.000005087915,0.0007543958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979965,0.00008355096,0.001150082,0.00002485555,0.000003156168,0.00001891459,0.00003377268,0.000002024006,0.0006870399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06000975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1193209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01426561592947213,"score_gpt":0.2549123187902529,"score_spread":0.2406467028607808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}